How do new species evolve

Turner, T. Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Biology 3 , e On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Via, S. Sympatric speciation in animals: The ugly duckling grows up.

The Hardy-Weinberg Principle. Evolution Introduction. Life History Evolution. Mutations Are the Raw Materials of Evolution. Speciation: The Origin of New Species. Avian Egg Coloration and Visual Ecology. The Ecology of Avian Brood Parasitism. The Maintenance of Species Diversity. Neutral Theory of Species Diversity. Population Genomics. Semelparity and Iteroparity. Geographic Mosaics of Coevolution. Comparative Genomics.

Cybertaxonomy and Ecology. Ecological Opportunity: Trigger of Adaptive Radiation. Evidence for Meat-Eating by Early Humans. Resource Partitioning and Why It Matters. The Evolution of Aging. Citation: Safran, R. Nature Education Knowledge 3 10 How do new species form? Like most areas of Evolutionary Biology, research related to the formation of new species - 'speciation ' - is rich in historical and current debate.

Here, we review both early and modern views on speciation, starting with Darwin and finishing with current genomics-era insights. Aa Aa Aa. Darwin's "Mystery of Mysteries". The Modern Synthesis. Barriers to reproduction. The role of geography in speciation. Biologists have long been fascinated with — and sought to explain — the origin and maintenance of biological diversity within and among species. Natural selection is generally recognized as a central mechanism of evolutionary change within species.

Thus, natural selection plays a major role in generating the array of phenotypic and genetic diversity observed in nature. But to what extent is selection also responsible for the formation of new species i. To what extent do phenotypic and species diversity arise via the same processes, as proposed by Darwin?

Figure 4. Ecological speciation in host-plant associated populations of Timema cristinae walking-stick insects individual populations feed on either the Ceanothus spinosus host plant or on Adenostoma fasciculatum. The role of sexual selection in speciation. A view that is becoming increasingly popular is that sexual selection, or selection related to variation in reproductive success, plays a role in speciation Panhuis et al.

This model suggests that differential patterns of trait variation related to reproductive success within populations contribute to the reproductive isolation among populations. A compelling example is related to the explosive radiation of cichlid fishes in the African Rift Lakes, where populations with overlapping distributions are diverging as a function of the differential preference of male color in mate selection Seehausen et al. Some models of speciation do not include a role for selection of any sort, but rather invoke a key role for chance events.

Current views: Mutation-order vs. A lack of strong examples for speciation by genetic drift, yet evidence for ecologically-similar species pairs Price , has led to the development of a powerful alternative mechanism to ecological speciation.

In essence, different populations find different genetic solutions to the same selective problem. In turn, the different genetic solutions i. Whereas different alleles are favored between two populations under ecological speciation, the same alleles would be favored in both populations under mutation-order speciation i. Divergence occurs anyway because, by chance, the populations do not acquire the same mutations or fix them in the same order. Divergence is therefore stochastic but the process involves selection, and thus is distinct from genetic drift.

Selection can be ecologically based under mutation-order speciation, but ecology does not favor divergence as such, and an association between ecological divergence and reproductive isolation is not expected. How might mutation-order speciation arise? Sexual selection might cause mutation-order speciation if reproductive isolation evolves by the fixation of alternative advantageous mutations — for example those which increase individual attractiveness — in different populations living in similar ecological environments.

For a summary of these models, see Table 1. References and Recommended Reading Butlin, R. Sympatric, parapatric or allopatric: The most important way to classify speciation? Coyne, J.

Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Animal Species and Evolution. Price, T. Speciation in Birds. Woodbury, NY: Roberts and Company, Article History Close.

Share Cancel. Revoke Cancel. Keywords Keywords for this Article. Save Cancel. Flag Inappropriate The Content is: Objectionable.

Flag Content Cancel. Email your Friend. Submit Cancel. This content is currently under construction. Explore This Subject. The case study is watertight because the set-up for the foundation mating between the two originator species was observed by a pair of scientists from Princeton University, who were visiting the Galapagos island of Daphne Major at the time. The year was and evolutionary biologists Rosemary and Peter Grant had been studying the finches of the island group.

When they noticed a strange bird with a largish beak and unusual song on Daphne Major, therefore, they knew immediately it was not one of the three finch species native to the place.

It turned out the intruder was from a species resident on Espanola Island, more than kilometres away. Unable to return and thus find a mate from its own species, the finch somehow managed to mate successfully with a local girl. Isolation is a critical step in speciation.

The successful interbreeding would never have happened had not the male finch been somehow massively blown off course and — remarkably — found landfall on another tiny speck in the Pacific. For the resultant offspring, however, the results were potentially dire. The baby finches were neither one nor the other, and developed with beaks and calls that were unmatched among the resident species. Like isolated populations of humans have occasionally been known to do, therefore, and perhaps equally unwisely, they turned for attention to their own siblings.

That means that the population gets smaller and smaller, until no more organisms of that species are left alive. Species become extinct for various reasons. If the environment changes too fast, the species might not be able to adapt fast enough. Also, a new species might evolve to compete with an existing species.

Biologists are sure that once a species becomes extinct it never appears again. In the modern world, biologists can identify species by seeing whether the organisms can breed with one another. Paleontologists have much more trouble with fossil species, because the organisms are no longer around to breed! All that can be done is to match up shells or imprints that look almost identical and then assume that they represent a species.

Paleontologists are sure that the fossil record is biased. That means that some kinds of organisms are much scarcer as fossils than they were when they were alive. Other kinds of organisms are much better represented by fossils. Animals with hard shells and skeletons are represented well in the fossil record.

On the other hand, soft-bodied animals are probably represented very poorly. It's likely that most soft-bodied species that ever existed are gone forever without a trace.